26 Nov 2014

Consultants - Impact Assessment of DAI-EDACE’s Grants (Pakistan)

Job from Development Alternatives, Inc.

—Closing date: 01 Dec 2014

Background Development Alternative Inc (DAI) is seeking to hire consultant(s) to conduct and Impact Assessment of its 10 grants being implemented under Enhanced Democratic Accountability and Civic Engagement (EDACE) programme. EDACE is a Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) funded programme managed by Development Alternatives Inc. EDACE is a grant making programme, aiming to make short-term, high-impact grants to improve rights awareness, citizen engagement, access to justice, and provision of security services to ensure that Pakistani citizen rights and democratic processes are improved, and trust between state and the society is strengthened at provincial and local levels. EDACE is mainly working around supply and demand side of rule of law and conflict prevention/resolution. Under the supply side of rule of law, the project is focusing to sensitize and improves service delivery of various public departments/bodies. Under demand side of rule of law, the project aims to aware local citizen of their human, legal and civic rights and to link them to public departments/bodies.

Following table describes key information of the project.

Start date: June 2014 End Date: March-2015 Total Budget GBP 6 M Target District:
Punjab 1. District Multan

The Impact Assessment will assess the progress of EDACE’s 10 grants (Summary of the Grants annexed) November 30, 2014, well as identify issues and recommend course corrections. It will also highlight issues and challenges affecting effective and efficient implementation of outputs and their contribution to Grants outcomes and impact and recommend whether results obtained thus far warrant an extension of the grants.

The review is being undertaken after the midpoint of grants implementation and will pave the way for improved delivery for the remaining duration duration and propose amendments (if any) required in Grants design, implementation arrangements and/or institutional linkages in order to effectively and sustainably contribute to the improvement in the rule of law and building trust between state and communities in the target areas.

a) RELEVANCE i. Assess the contribution of the grants towards the achievement of the EDACE’s overall objectives ii. Analyze whether the grants based approach addresses the needs and demands of the beneficiaries in a disaggregated manner (for men and women). iii. Assess the relevance of the tools / instruments / inputs applied by the grants.

b) EFFECTIVENESS i. Review whether the grants have accomplished their outputs. In particular, review: • Area selection criteria and its implementation • Targeting strategy for the identification of Grants beneficiaries including both men and women. • Any emerging effect of the grants on beneficiaries including both male and female ii. Assess the performance of the grants so far with particular reference to qualitative and quantitative achievements of outputs and targets as defined in the grants agreements and work-plans and with reference to the Grants baseline and also forecast the achievements of these grants in the remaining period of the project.

c) EFFICIENCY I. Assess whether the grants achievements against the grants targets, and comment whether the grants have the capacity to deliver the agreed result at the output and outcome levels II. Analyse the performance of the Monitoring and Evaluation mechanism of the Grants and the use of various M&E tools III. Assess the qualitative and quantitative aspects of management and other inputs (such as monitoring and review and other technical assistance and budgetary inputs) provided by the grants vis-à-vis achievement of outputs and targets. IV. Identify factors and constraints which have affected grants implementation including technical, managerial, organizational, institutional and socio-economic policy issues in addition to other external factors unforeseen during the grants design.

d) SUSTAINABILITY AND IMPACT I. Assess preliminary indications of the degree to which the Grants results are likely to be sustainable beyond the Grants’ lifetime (both at the community and institutional level), and provide recommendations for strengthening sustainability II. Analyse the emerging impact on the communities for both men and women in terms of awareness of rights; trust building; and conflict prevention and resolution III. Based on the findings (relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability and impact) recommend whether extension of this Grants is warranted.

e) NETWORK /LINKAGES I. Evaluate the level, degree and representation by the beneficiaries and stakeholders, (government and EDACE team) in the implementation of the Grants (with particular attention to the development and testing of grants implementation approaches) II. Examine the synergies and potential overlap between particular grants and other donor funded programmes in the relevant districts and propose strategy to enhance complementarities. III. Assess the Grants’ knowledge management strategies and outreach and communications to all stakeholders.

f) Lessons learnt/ Conclusions I. Analyze areas for improved programme planning, especially with respect to setting targets II. Identify significant lessons or conclusions which can be drawn from the Grants in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and networking. Special attention may be given to the context (Political development, security, and natural disasters) and the coping strategies developed by the Grants to maintain work momentum. III. Recommend grants continuation or otherwise in the post March 2013 phase.

The Consultant’s findings and recommendations will be thoroughly discussed with EDACE, relevant grantees, and FCO.

The Consultant will complete and submit a draft final report in both hard and soft copies. The Consultant will finalize the report in the light of comments/suggestions of stakeholders. The key outputs are:

a) Methodology: Submission of detailed methodology of IA b) Draft Report Template: Submission of a draft report format containing Table of Contents for the final report for approval by DAI. c) An Aide Memoire (including key findings and recommendations) and its presentation: The Consultant will present the aide memoire to FCO, and DAI. d) The Draft and Final IA Reports: The report should be logically structured, contain evidence-based findings, conclusions, lessons and recommendations, and should be free of information that is not relevant to the overall analysis. The report should respond in detail to the key focus areas described above. It should include a set of specific recommendations formulated for the Grants, and identify the necessary actions required to be undertaken, who should undertake those and possible time-lines (if any). Grants stakeholders will provide comments on the Draft Report, and the Consultant will finalize the report in view of these comments. e) Presentation: For presenting and discussing the draft final report interactively, the consultants will facilitate a one-day concluding workshop for the FCO and DAI

Consultant(s) must have a solid (minimum 10 years) experience of evaluation in the related discipline.

The consultant(s) will be responsible for devising detailed methodology of the IA. However, the consultant will adopt a consultative and participative approach. This will include field visits to Grants sites and meetings with communities / Grants direct beneficiaries in 10 districts namely Multan, Muzaffargarh, Rajanpur, Sukkur, Ghotki, Larkana, Jaccobabad, Kashmore, Hyderabad, and Karachi to collect first-hand information. The Consultant will also meet with the Grants team, relevant government agencies / partners at provincial and district level, if need be. The Consultant may also meet other agencies / Grants engaged in similar interventions. The MTE will start with a meeting at DAI Office and conclude with a debriefing meeting with DAI and grantees.

Consulting firms or individual consultants may apply. Due to the time frame and complexity of the projects, it is recommended that individual consultants may not apply / be fielded for more than one evaluation study.

o EDACE Project Document o Grants Agreements and Work plans o EDACE and Grants log-frames o Quarterly and Monthly progress reports
o EDACE and Grants’ own Baseline survey reports

Email to sohail_hashmi@dai.com ( Operations, Finance & Grants Manager)..

1.                  Background

Development Alternative Inc (DAI) is seeking to hire consultant(s) to conduct and Impact Assessment of its 10 grants being implemented under Enhanced Democratic Accountability and Civic Engagement (EDACE) programme. EDACE is a Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) funded programme managed by Development Alternatives Inc.

EDACE is a grant making programme, aiming to make short-term, high-impact grants to improve rights awareness, citizen engagement, access to justice, and provision of security services to ensure that Pakistani citizen rights and democratic processes are improved, and trust between state and the society is strengthened at provincial and local levels.

EDACE is mainly working around supply and demand side of rule of law and conflict prevention/resolution. Under the supply side of rule of law, the project is focusing to sensitize and improves service delivery of various public departments/bodies. Under demand side of rule of law, the project aims to aware local citizen of their human, legal and civic rights and to link them to public departments/bodies.

Following table describes key information of the project.

2.                  Objectives of the Impact Assessment

The Impact Assessment will assess the progress of EDACE’s 10 grants (Summary of the Grants annexed) November 30, 2014, well as identify issues and recommend course corrections.  It will also highlight issues and challenges affecting effective and efficient implementation of outputs and their contribution to Grants outcomes and impact and recommend whether results obtained thus far warrant an extension of the grants.

The review is being undertaken after the midpoint of grants implementation and will pave the way for improved delivery for the remaining duration duration and propose amendments (if any) required in Grants design, implementation arrangements and/or institutional linkages in order to effectively and sustainably contribute to the improvement in the rule of law and building trust between state and communities in the target areas. 

3.                  Duration of the Consultancy:

The duration of the consultancy is one month. The consultancy will begin by December 1, 2014 and presentation of the Final Repot must be made by or before December31, 2014.

Key Focus Areas

The Consultant will assess grants (awarded under the EDACE programme) according to standard evaluation and impact assessment criteria, as elaborated below.

a)                  Relevance

b)                  Effectiveness

c)                  Efficiency

                    I.                        Assess whether the grants achievements against the grants targets, and comment whether the grants have the capacity to deliver the agreed result at the output and outcome levels

                  II.                        Analyse the performance of the Monitoring and Evaluation mechanism of the Grants and the use of various M&E tools

                III.                        Assess the qualitative and quantitative aspects of management and other inputs (such as monitoring and review and other technical assistance and budgetary inputs) provided by the grants vis-à-vis achievement of outputs and targets.

                IV.                        Identify factors and constraints which have affected grants implementation including technical, managerial, organizational, institutional and socio-economic policy issues in addition to other external factors unforeseen during the grants design.

d)                 Sustainability and Impact

                    I.                        Assess preliminary indications of the degree to which the Grants results are likely to be sustainable beyond the Grants’ lifetime (both at the community and institutional level), and provide recommendations for strengthening sustainability

                  II.                        Analyse the emerging impact on the communities for both men and women in terms of awareness of rights; trust building; and conflict prevention and resolution

                III.                        Based on the findings (relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, sustainability and impact) recommend whether extension of this Grants is warranted.

e)                  Network /linkages

                    I.                        Evaluate the level, degree and representation by the beneficiaries and stakeholders, (government and  EDACE team) in the implementation of the Grants (with particular attention to the development and testing of grants implementation approaches)

                  II.                        Examine the synergies and potential overlap between particular grants and other donor funded programmes in the relevant districts and propose strategy to enhance complementarities.

                III.                        Assess the Grants’ knowledge management strategies and outreach and communications to all stakeholders.

f)                   Lessons learnt/ Conclusions

                    I.                        Analyze areas for improved programme planning, especially with respect to setting targets

                  II.                        Identify significant lessons or conclusions which can be drawn from the Grants in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and networking. Special attention may be given to the context (Political development, security, and natural disasters) and the coping strategies developed by the Grants to maintain work momentum.

                III.                        Recommend grants continuation or otherwise in the post March 2013 phase.

5.                  Outputs

The Consultant’s findings and recommendations will be thoroughly discussed with EDACE, relevant grantees, and FCO.

The Consultant will complete and submit a draft final report in both hard and soft copies. The Consultant will finalize the report in the light of comments/suggestions of stakeholders. The key outputs are:

a)      Methodology: Submission of detailed methodology of IA

b)      Draft Report Template: Submission of a draft report format containing Table of Contents for the final report for approval by DAI.

c)      An Aide Memoire (including key findings and recommendations) and its presentation: The Consultant will present the aide memoire to FCO, and DAI.

d)      The Draft and Final IA Reports: The report should be logically structured, contain evidence-based findings, conclusions, lessons and recommendations, and should be free of information that is not relevant to the overall analysis. The report should respond in detail to the key focus areas described above. It should include a set of specific recommendations formulated for the Grants, and identify the necessary actions required to be undertaken, who should undertake those and possible time-lines (if any).  Grants stakeholders will provide comments on the Draft Report, and the Consultant will finalize the report in view of these comments.

e)      Presentation: For presenting and discussing the draft final report interactively, the consultants will facilitate a one-day concluding workshop for the FCO and DAI

6.         Qualification of the Consultant(s)

Consultant(s) must have a solid (minimum 10 years) experience of evaluation in the related discipline.

The consultant(s) will be responsible for devising detailed methodology of the IA. However, the consultant will adopt a consultative and participative approach. This will include field visits to Grants sites and meetings with communities / Grants direct beneficiaries in 10 districts namely Multan, Muzaffargarh, Rajanpur, Sukkur, Ghotki, Larkana, Jaccobabad, Kashmore, Hyderabad, and Karachi to collect first-hand information. The Consultant will also meet with the Grants team, relevant government agencies / partners at provincial and district level, if need be. The Consultant may also meet other agencies / Grants engaged in similar interventions. The MTE will start with a meeting at DAI Office and conclude with a debriefing meeting with DAI and grantees. 

Consulting firms or individual consultants may apply. Due to the time frame and complexity of the projects, it is recommended that individual consultants may not apply / be fielded for more than one evaluation study.

8.                  Background Documents

Public-Reproductive Health Specialist, Assessment of the Pakistan Initiative for Mothers and Newborn and Family Advancement for Life and Health Programs, Pakistan

Company Profile:

MSI is an international development firm in the Washington, D.C., metro area with a 30-year history of helping to deliver results across the developing world. In 2008, we became part of Coffey International Limited. Since that time, we have greatly expanded our ability to respond seamlessly and flexibly to client needs with Coffey's international development offices in the United Kingdom and Australia. We operate in some of the most challenging political and economic climates in the world, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and South Sudan. MSI currently employs 800 development experts in the fields of public sector management, monitoring and evaluation, governance, and anticorruption. For more information on MSI, please visit our website at www.msiworldwide.com.
Project Summary:

In June 2011, MSI was awarded a contract by USAID to provide monitoring, verification and evaluation services to USAID covering USAID-supported programs throughout Pakistan. The goal of the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (MEP) is to assess whether USAID resources are well-spent and achieving desired results and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the administration of programs, regardless of the implementation mechanism.

Position Summary:

MSI is conducting an assessment of USAID’s Pakistan Initiative for Mothers and Newborn (PAIMAN) and Family Advancement for Life and Health (FALAH) programs to help determine which of the Mission’s current Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Program activities should be continued. The goal of PAIMAN was to reduce maternal, newborn, and child mortality in Pakistan through viable and demonstrable initiatives and programs aimed at building the capacity of existing structures within the country’s health systems. The FALAH program intended to address the high unmet need for family planning services in Pakistan. The findings of MSI’s assessment will help inform ongoing restructuring of the MCH Program. A locally-recruited Public/Reproductive Health Specialist will support the assessment team in developing and finalizing data collection instruments; overseeing and participating in data collection efforts; data analysis and report writing; and communicating findings and recommendations to USAID/Pakistan.

Please note: Only Pakistani citizens are eligible for this position.

Responsibilities:

• Review all relevant program documents required to understand the assessment.

• Participate in a Team Planning Workshop in Islamabad to review the assessment’s purpose and methodology.

• Assist with finalization of work plan and data collection instruments.

• Participate in data analysis.

• Participate in report writing.

• Participate in a debriefing sessions with USAID/Pakistan on the findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

• Undertake other tasks required for the successful completion of the assessment.

Qualifications:

• At least a Master’s degree in public health or a related field.

• At least ten years of experience in public health management, maternal and child health care, and/or family planning.

• Experience in applied research or monitoring and evaluation, particularly focusing on public and reproductive health in Pakistan.

• Experience analyzing qualitative and quantitative research data.

• Fluency in English and Urdu required.

• Demonstrated leadership and communication skills.

Only candidates who have been selected for an interview will be contacted. No phone calls, please.

MSI is an EEO/AA/ADA Veterans Employer.

To apply: Please visit our website, www.msiworldwide.comPI83241783
Apply Here

Public/Reproductive Health Specialist, Assessment of the Pakistan Initiative for Mothers and Newborn and Family Advancement for Life and Health Programs, Pakistan

Company Profile:

MSI is an international development firm in the Washington, D.C., metro area with a 30-year history of helping to deliver results across the developing world. In 2008, we became part of Coffey International Limited. Since that time, we have greatly expanded our ability to respond seamlessly and flexibly to client needs with Coffey's international development offices in the United Kingdom and Australia. We operate in some of the most challenging political and economic climates in the world, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, and South Sudan. MSI currently employs 800 development experts in the fields of public sector management, monitoring and evaluation, governance, and anticorruption. For more information on MSI, please visit our website at www.msiworldwide.com.
Project Summary:

In June 2011, MSI was awarded a contract by USAID to provide monitoring, verification and evaluation services to USAID covering USAID-supported programs throughout Pakistan. The goal of the Monitoring and Evaluation Program (MEP) is to assess whether USAID resources are well-spent and achieving desired results and to prevent waste, fraud, and abuse in the administration of programs, regardless of the implementation mechanism.

Position Summary:

MSI is conducting an assessment of USAID’s Pakistan Initiative for Mothers and Newborn (PAIMAN) and Family Advancement for Life and Health (FALAH) programs to help determine which of the Mission’s current Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Program activities should be continued. The goal of PAIMAN was to reduce maternal, newborn, and child mortality in Pakistan through viable and demonstrable initiatives and programs aimed at building the capacity of existing structures within the country’s health systems. The FALAH program intended to address the high unmet need for family planning services in Pakistan. The findings of MSI’s assessment will help inform ongoing restructuring of the MCH Program. The Lead Evaluator/Public Health Specialist will lead the assessment team in developing and finalizing data collection instruments; overseeing and participating in data collection efforts; data analysis and report writing; and communicating findings and recommendations to USAID/Pakistan.

The assignment is expected to take place from mid-September-December and will require 6-8 weeks of fieldwork in Pakistan from last week of September through mid-November. The Lead Evaluator/Public Health Specialist will report to the Senior Advisor for Evaluations.

Responsibilities:

• Review all relevant program documents required to understand the assessment.

• Participate in a Team Planning Workshop (TPW) in Islamabad to review the assessment’s purpose and methodology.

• Assist with finalization of work plan and data collection instruments.

• Assign roles and responsibilities to study team members during the TPW.

• Lead and participate in data analysis.

• Lead and participate in report writing.

• Debrief USAID/Pakistan on the findings, conclusions, and recommendations.

• Complete the final assessment report.

• Undertake other tasks required for the successful completion of the study.

Qualifications:

• At least a Master’s degree in public health, social sciences, or a related field.

• At least 15 years of experience in public health management, maternal and child health care, and/or family planning.

• Experience leading applied research initiatives and evaluations, particularly focusing on public and reproductive health.

• Experience working in Pakistan and/or South Asia preferred.

• Experience evaluating USAID-funded programs preferred.

• Fluency in English required.

• Demonstrated leadership and communication skills.

Only candidates who have been selected for an interview will be contacted. No phone calls, please.

MSI is an EEO/AA/ADA Veterans Employer.PI83241793
Apply Here

Relevant Experience:

Job Description:

Deliverables: The substance of, findings on, and recommendations with respect to the above mentioned tasks shall be delivered by Consultant(s) in a written deliverable in the standard report format of the project.

“We will recruit on a rolling basis, beginning interviews before the deadline date, and if suitable person is identified we will close the application process.”

View the original article here

View the original article here